The iconic 422‑passenger NIPPON MARU, operated by Mitsui Ocean Cruises, was officially retired on May 10, 2026, in Yokohama. Shortly after her final voyage, the vessel was beached for dismantling, and her elegant interior — known for its classic Japanese craftsmanship — is now being removed piece by piece.

As part of AACASINO Solutions®’ ongoing work in casino brokerage, ship casino advisory, and global gaming equipment supply, we have secured access to a wide range of fixtures, fittings, memorabilia, and original casino equipment from the NIPPON MARU.
Buyers can explore these items directly through our equipment catalogue:

👉 https://aacasinosolutions.com/products/equipment

This includes unique collectibles and operational gaming assets — among them the visually striking “Butterfly” double‑ended roulette table. While it is an interesting piece of cruise‑ship history, AACASINO strongly advises against using this table in any modern casino environment due to significant operational and compliance risks.

Why Double‑Ended Roulette Tables Are a High‑Risk Choice for Casinos

Double‑ended roulette tables became popular in jurisdictions where gaming tax is calculated per table, not per wheel. Operators believed they could:

• Seat more players
• Pay tax on only one table
• Purchase only one wheel

However, this perceived advantage is overshadowed by serious AML risks, operational inefficiencies, liability exposure, and poor player experience.

1. No Real Savings in Staffing or Operating Costs

Despite the dual layout, casinos still require:

• The same number of dealers
• The same surveillance coverage
• The same maintenance and utilities
• The same pit supervision

There is no reduction in labour or operating expense, and no measurable improvement in efficiency.